Skip to main content

The Antisociality of Social Media Part 5: What We Won't See

 Like most people, the mass murder of children makes me physically ill. With every news clip, every tweet, every Facebook post, every banner scrolling across news pages related to the tragedy in Connecticut, I feel like I got punched in the gut. There is a reason why our reactions strike at the core of our beings--most of us actually give a damn about other people. Most of us actually care about the children. Most of us do see ourselves as our brother's keeper. So seeing these events unfold elicits a visceral response that leaves us in tears, or angry, or confused, or wanting to do something at a time when for all intents and purposes, we are helpless.

We each have our own reasons why we react so personally to tragedy states away. The common denominator is that we have a moral compass--a gauge inside of us that says, "This is the most extreme form of wrong I have ever seen." Aside from that common denominator, our reasons stem from our personal life experiences.

For me, I think back to my time working as an Xray tech and standing there in the trauma room waiting for the ambulance to pull up. My colleagues and I would ready ourselves in anticipation of the victim who was about to be wheeled into the room, mulling over in our heads what needed to be done first. When the paramedics would radio in that they were transporting a kid to our facility, we would concentrate even harder on our coming tasks--most likely to keep ourselves from losing it at the thought of a harmed child.



Another scene that is as fresh in my mind today as it was 15 years ago or so, are the eyes of a child slain in a triple homicide. Getting called to the morgue to Xray victims of heinous crimes was one thing, but looking into the eyes of a murdered child was another. I will never forget that face. Never.

How many images must we see to conjure up real feelings in the wake of tragedy? Well, for me, it only takes one.

I feel compelled to share this with you, dear reader, because yesterday we saw something horrific occur in our own back yard. We saw the unexplainable happen. We saw a senseless act of murder happen as a cauldron of mental illness, accessibility of guns and a deeper demon we may never understand stewed until it boiled over, claiming the lives of 26 people who could never have seen that coming.

In our online world, we saw the cybersphere immediately erupt with expressions of grief, of outrage, of sympathy, and confusion. And just as our own visceral responses were expressed, the visceral response of others quickly followed. As quickly as one person would post a call for action on gun violence, another would retort that now is not the time to talk about that topic. As quickly as one person would post a call for meaningful discussion on the needs of the mentally ill, another would respond that this was an act of a terrorist, or a purely evil being, and not someone to be pitied. As quickly as one person would speak to larger issues at play in our culture that might drive senseless acts of violence, another would retort that it is only a few bad apples, so why punish the whole lot?

I, myself, was accused of relishing in the deaths of children if only to advance my secret liberal agenda to abolish gun rights. I can only take pity on the fellow twitterer, as this person does not know me personally. Maybe if this person knew my life experiences, he would know that when I see these tragedies unfold, I see the same lifeless eyes staring up at me as I did 15 years ago. I see those same eyes that seem to ask, "why are you doing this to me?"

This person does not know that, nor does he know that I have several nieces and nephews the same ages as the victims in Connecticut. This person does not know that the thought of such a horrific thing happening to Ben, or Luke or Ruby, or Oliver, strikes at the core of my being and makes me physically ill. This person does not know that I do, in fact, care about the children.

How could he?

For the ignorance that is forced upon us by an online existence, I will forgive my fellow twitterer, and apologize for being presumptuous about his life experiences.

In our online world, we saw all of this and will continue to see it in the coming days. We will also see the names of the victims and their families released. We will see photos of the children playing, laughing, posing with family or with arms stretched around the family pet. We will see politicians debate topics such as gun violence, school security and care for the mentally ill. We will see posts of prayers for the innocents. And yes, we will see people argue that one is right and the other wrong in their responses and beliefs in the wake of tragedy. Sadly, we will see all of this.

What we won't see is 20 children waking up on what should be a typical Saturday morning. We won't see 20 children watching cartoons over breakfast, laughing until the milk snorts from their noses, making them laugh even harder. We won't see 20 children lacing up their gym shoes before their Saturday basketball games. We won't see 20 children getting ready to go to see Santa at the local mall or city park. We won't see 20 kids witness the closing ceremonies of Hanukkah. We won't see 20 children get excited in anticipation of the yearly Christmas parade. We won't see 20 kids plead with their moms and dads to spend the afternoon baking cookies. We won't see 20 kids mark off another day until winter break on their calendars. We won't see 20 kids waking up safe, in their own homes, surrounded by love and warmth and hope for the future.

We won't see any of that.

And neither will their parents.






Popular posts from this blog

The Antisociality of Social Media (Part 1)...Who Are We? How Did We Get Here?

(Response forthcoming in part two) I'm bad with names. I can remember a face no problem. But names are automatically sent to an unlockable vault deep within the cortex of my brain. I don't know if it is my short term memory that is a problem or long term. I have forgotten names of people I have just met while they are finishing their "Hi, I'm so and so. Nice to meet you." You had me at Hi and lost me by "I'm so and so." Likewise, I also can't remember the names of people I grew up with. I dread going out and about in my hometown for fear that I will run into someone who is purportedly my BFF from 1986 and I just don't remember his or her name to save my life. I'm partial to the Elaine Benes idea that we should all wear name tags. (For those not familiar with Seinfeld, Google it.) Now, one might be inclined to suggest that I see a neurologist to have a thorough hippocampus evaluation. But I'm not so sure the problem is c...

Overpopulaton of Punctuation Marks Threatens Message Extinction

[Because this bears repeating in such desperate times] Scientists report that a recent rise in the overuse of punctuation marks will ultimately lead to the demise of the common message. It is not known if the increasing trend of ending a sentence with multiple and in some cases, mixed, punctuation marks is the result of the natural evolution of messaging, or if human actions are speeding the process. What is clear, though, is that punctuation marks and messages are not taking their impending doom lying down. In a rare twist of bipartisanship, punctuation marks and messages came together to call for measures to halt the message crisis and return our civilization back to the days of making points in a clear, concise manner. Speaking for the punctuators, Exclamation point stated, "I'm a loner. You don't need two of me. The whole purpose of my existence is to accentuate a  point. I thought I was doing that just fine already." Mr. Question Mark had this to...

Planning for Parenthood Involves Maintaining Your Health. Or, Why I Support Planned Parenthood

Given that I don't have kids, the title of this post may seem a bit odd. What do I know about planning for parenthood, right? I don't have much room to talk, right? Sure, I might not be one of the lucky ones who enjoys the joys of little bundles of joy, but I'm going to ask you to cut me a little slack before you judge. After all, at the age of nineteen, when I first moved away from home to prepare for a career in Radiography, I did not know I would be childless many moons later.