Skip to main content

An Open Letter to Women Who Are Not Helping

"I respect your views. I ask you to respect my views."--Senator Dianne Feinstein

Dear Woman Who Criticized Sen. Feinstein :

Please take a cue from No Doubt and Don't Speak.

If you are a political junky, you undoubtedly have read or heard about the recent exchange between Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA) and some guy from Texas over gun control. I generally extend respect to those in elected positions by using their earned titles and proper names. I hope you can excuse me, dear reader, if I exercise my right to be rude in referring to the elected official from the great state of Texas as "some guy." I anticipate that after his next bid for re-election, he will find himself among the ranks of just some guys.


I'll not even try to get wonky here or offer my meager bent on the legality of banning assault weapons. Like the senior Senator from California, I too, have seen dead people, and know what it is like to never forget. While I have not lived in a war zone, or served in the military, or survived what should have been a normal day at school, I have seen enough lives lost through gun violence--or even accidents in the home--to understand the Senator's stance on this issue.

No, I won't enter the political carnival. Rachel Maddow has already taken care of that for all of us and then some. (Thank you for that, Dr. Maddow.) What I'd like to do, dear reader, is bring to light a voice of opposition that for all intents and purposes, should really be kept in the dark. This voice is so difficult to listen to, that I'll not put a name on it, for it spews forth from the mouth of she-who-should-not-be-named. This might be sort of juvenile of me, but I am hoping that if we just all close our eyes and wish it away, this person will just quit talking.

Better yet, maybe she-who-should-not-be-named should take a walk through Sen. Feinstein's Pensieve  and experience what it is like to see two of your colleagues lying on the floor dead at the hand of a gunman. Or perhaps she would do herself well to shadow those teary-eyed women who lost their children at Sandy Hook Elementary School back in December. And it just might help crack the ice that consumes she-who-should-not-be-named's pericardial sac if she were to spend a few days with Hadiya Pendleton's mother, who is surely a weepy woman at times still today.

But I doubt that she-who-should-not-be-named will ever spend time in the shoes of the women she criticizes. Heck, she probably doesn't have the Chootz-Pawh* to address the 300 pounds missing from CPAC face-to-face. No, she'd rather stay in the confines of her extremist abodes, where she can safely say things like the following about Sen. Feinstein and get in a double-whammy by including Sec. Clinton:

"Whenever they get asked a question they don't like, they start crying."--Neither Sen. Feinstein nor Sec. Clinton cried in their hearings. As one GOP hero would say, "Well, here we go again." One Tea Party Conservative's "passionate" is another's "crying."

"I'd like to see how that would go over in a law school class when a professor asks you to distinguish cases."--Oh, that's right, because Sec. Clinton NEVER went to law school.

"He nailed her, so she said "I'm offended."--No, actually, Sen. Feinstein thanked the guy from Texas for his book report on the Bill of Rights.

She then goes on to throw a blanket policy on voting over all women:

“I used to think women just should not be able to vote."--Oh, if Susan B. Anthony could hear you now, I'm sure she'd be getting all "hysterical" and crying "crocodile tears." Not. Perhaps she-who-should-not-be-named should click on over to the Scholastic website, where they provide a nice, little history of women's voting rights in America. I must caution, though, that these resources are to be used as aides by teachers, and I'm sure she-who-should-not-be-named thinks they are pretty dumb, too.

We all Monday-morning quarterback at some point in our lives. Heck, I Monday-morning point guard, power forward, pitch, pinch-hit, goal-keep, you name it. Why not Monday-morning legislate (senate-ate?)? It's easy to shake your head radically while spitting out insults from behind a desk in a TV studio. It's easy to be the bully. But on such an important issue, on such an important bill--that used to be law--brought forth by a pretty important woman (must be to get elected to serve over 20 years in the Senate), it would do some good if some people would Just. Shut. Up.

So please, women who are not helping, do us all a favor and don't speak.

Respectfully submitted,
This Girl


*Phonetic spelling intended


Popular posts from this blog

The Antisociality of Social Media: Spies Like Us?

BREAKING: MEDIA NEWS: Millions outraged by reports of a massive spying by the National Security Agency have taken to social media to share the intimate details of their lives in protest. Mary Jean Andreson of Cornerville, WI posted this on Facebook in response to the NSA scandal: "Why the heck does the NSA care that my husband is a no good, lazy crumb who never takes the trash out?" Kevin Treadway of Penooka, MO also expressed his outrage by sharing the details of his dating life on Facebook: "Dumped again. Girls suck. So what if I chew my food with my mouth open and talk while drinking? You've never seen beer trickle down someone's chin? Come on! I'm never asking anyone out again. EVER!!!! Got that, NSA????????? Susan Leapletter of Turnbridge County, TX, who was --feeling crappy, was even more irate with her status update: "My boss and coworkers are such a losers! Who cares if I took extra office supplies home. Doesn't EVERYONE?!?!?!? Why do I...

The Antisociality of Social Media Part 10: Breaking Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad Habits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BREAKING: ENTERTAINMENT NEWS: Reality TV power house, Bravo announced today that it will be addressing Punctuation Mark Addiction in a new series, Breaking  Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad Habits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The idea for the show was pitched by the Collective Union of Simple Messages, or CUOSM, after a campaign to fight message loss through punctuation mark abuse failed miserably. CUOSM teamed up with the informal organization the Punctuators to stall what appeared to be unsustainable punctuation overpopulation. The message had an anticlimactic effect, though, when social media users started sharing the memes originating from the campaign, while adding comments like "So True!!!!!" and "IKR?????!!"

Turning Off, Tuning Out and Dropping the Baggage

Insanity laughs, under pressure we're cracking Can't we give ourselves one more chance --Under Pressure Queen, David Bowie I got my first taste of the news when I was a young sap, watching the great Walter Jacobson with my Dad. It was pretty much an evening ritual--newspaper, Wally, and maybe a little Dan Rather. Somewhere in there, Dad managed to eat dinner. I just can't remember the order of events. What I do remember is that this pretty much sums it up. There was no gluing of eyes to the tube watching talking head after talking head report the same exact story over and over, but with a different touch of flair. There was no getting up early in the morning to share your coffee with two spiffy gents and the token female who should really rethink the amount of time she spends in tanning beds. Reading prepared remarks from a teleprompter or repeating what the producer says in your earpiece is hardly what I would call "analysis," but somehow it passes as ...